Service functions

• Download center

• Add to My Report

• My Report (0)

• Print this Page

• Download in PDF

• Share
• Feedback

• Interactive analysis

• Browsing history

  • Litigation in 2011
  • Environmental protection and resource saving
  • Company Overview
  • Key trends of the Holding Company’s development strategy
  • International Activities and Implementation of Major International Projects
• Offline version

• Company in soc.networks

• Watch report 2011

• Popular pages

• Company on the map

• Compact view

Share

Company in soc.networks

Send page by e-mail

E-mail recipient *		Your e-mail *
Comment :
	Change picture	Type the word on the picture *
	Send
	* required fields

Send report to e-mail

Enter e-mail recipient *		Your e-mail *
Comment :
	Send	Back to My Report
	* required fields

Litigation in 2011

Information of court proceedings for 2012 where JSC “RZD” is a respondent

20,825 cases initiated by claims lodged against JSC “RZD” with a total amount of RUR 19,656,942.2 th. were pending in court in 2012.

10,030 cases (including with expired period for appeal) for a total amount of RUR 5,605,949.2 th. were considered, including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 7,141 cases for a total amount of RUR 1,960,976.0 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 2,889 cases for a total amount of RUR 3,644,973.2 th.;

10,793 cases for an amount of RUR 14,048,575.1 th. are pending.

Including:

Trial courts

considered 6,347 cases for a total amount of RUR 8,997,374.4 th., including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 4,884 cases for a total amount of RUR 1,637,973.6 th.;
• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 1,463 cases for a total amount of RUR 7,359,400.8 th.;

3,152 cases for a total amount of RUR 3,818,253.6 th. are pending.

Courts of appeal

considered 1,041 cases for a total amount of RUR 820,899.0 th., including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 687 cases for a total amount of RUR 390,734.9 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 354 cases for a total amount of RUR 430,164.1 th.;

111 cases for a total amount of RUR 252,579.7 th. are pending.

Courts of cassation

considered 88 cases for a total amount of RUR 129,626.7 th., including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 66 cases for a total amount of RUR 51,566 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 22 cases for a total amount of RUR 78,060.7 th.;

54 cases for a total amount of RUR 29,841.7 th. are pending.

Information of court proceedings for 2012 where JSC “RZD” is a plaintiff

13,075 cases initiated by claims lodged by JSC “RZD” with a total amount of RUR 14,320,378.6 th. were pending in court in 2012.

2,160,067.6 cases (including with expired period for appeal) for a total amount of RUR 2,160,067.6 th. were considered, including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 1,499 cases for a total amount of RUR 707,561.5 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 5,822 cases for a total amount of RUR 1,408,506.1 th.;

5,753 cases for a total amount of RUR 12,201,316.1 th. are pending.

Including:

Trial courts

considered 3,150 cases for a total amount of RUR 716,024.2 th., including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 446 cases for a total amount of RUR 162,663.4 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 2,704 cases for a total amount of RUR 552,360.8 th.;

1,982 cases for a total amount of RUR 10,486,190.7 th. are pending.

Courts of appeal

considered 465 cases for a total amount of RUR 244,169.5 th., including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 188 cases for a total amount of RUR 144,887.8 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 277 cases for a total amount of RUR 99,281.7 th.;

58 cases for a total amount of RUR 32,602 th. are pending.

Courts of cassation

considered 68 cases for a total amount of RUR 712,684.5 th., including:

• not in favor of JSC “RZD” 24 cases for a total amount of RUR 120,161.1 th.;
• in favor of JSC “RZD” 44 cases for a total amount of RUR 592,523.4 th.;

30 cases for a total amount of RUR 9,645.2 th. are pending.

Information on potential circumstances that objectively impede the Company’s activities

In 2012, as a result of earthquakes, hazardous meteorological and hydrological phenomena occurring in the territory of the Russian Federation railway facilities included in the infrastructure of JSC “RZD” were locally damaged, which did not escalate into emergencies and did not have a significant impact on the industry.

Consequences of the damage were quickly liquidated at the expense of JSC “RZD” without the involvement of territorial unified state emergency prevention and response system.